Hollywood, 0.09% BAC, Pot Smell, Plea to Speeding

Our client was returning from a night of drinking with his friends.  As he was driving home, he and his friends smoked marijuana in his car.  Approaching the 101 Freeway on Santa Monica Blvd., he accelerated to get up to speed for the freeway on-ramp. 
Without All the Details, What Happened?:  Client Speeding in Hollywood, BAC of 0.09% and Smoking Marijuana, Case Resolved for Excessive Speed (Vehicle Code § 23109) Only,  DUI Charges Dismissed, Metro Courthouse.
An officer traveling the opposite direction noticed the client, made a U-turn and allegedly paced our client before making a traffic stop 0.4 miles after he first noticed our client.  The police officer alleged he paced our client and measured his speed at 50 miles per hour.

The reader of this summary may recognize that someone traveling 50 miles per hour covers 0.4 miles in about 27 seconds.  In addition, when someone notices the flashing lights of a police officer in one’s rear view mirror, one usually takes 0.1 miles or more to pull over.  This meant that the police officer claimed he observed our client, turned around, went from a dead stop to accelerate enough to 50 miles to pace the client and turned on his lights within just 0.3 miles, or in about 20 seconds.

We all know from car commercials that the fastest cars can accelerate from 0 to 50 miles per hour in about 7 seconds, or in about a quarter mile.

The math means the cop made a U-turn and also paced our client in 13 second or so.  We all know a U-turn can take ten seconds, even if done quickly.  That meant the cop paced our client for three seconds.

After the traffic stop, the police officer allegedly smelled marijuana and the odor of alcohol.  Our client indeed had consumed alcohol and his BAC was 0.09%.

He was then promptly arrested and taken to the police station.

Greg Hill then appeared in the Metropolitan Courthouse (1845 South Hill Street) and explained to the City Attorney assigned to the case the improbable pacing claimed in the police report.  Greg showed the prosecutor a map of the location and showed where the officer claimed to have first seen our client and where the traffic stop took place, according to the police report.

Greg explained that were the case to proceed to trial, it would be likely that the jury would find the officer’s claims of pacing our client to be untrue.  The City Attorney agreed and offered to settle the matter for a violation of Vehicle Code § 23109, excessive speed nevertheless, but not a DUI.

According to the terms of the plea bargain, our client would pay a $240 fine, plus penalties and assessments, and be placed on twenty-four months of summary probation.  He would not have to attend a DUI program for the court.
 
Our client gladly accepted, as he was relieved to avoid the ignition interlock requirement associated with a DUI.  He was also very happy with the result because he would have lost his job as a truck driver if he were convicted of DUI.

For more information about what punishment is involved in a first-time DUI, as well as a wet reckless, click on the following articles:
  1. What Punishment Do I Face for First-Time DUI?
  2. 10 Things to Do if Stopped for DUI
  3. Why Is a “Wet Reckless” Better Than a DUI?
Watch our video about DUI by clicking here.
 
Contact us.
Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him.
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards,
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help.
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot.
★★★★★