Our client, age 41 in 2013, suffered a conviction for DUI out of the Fullerton Courthouse. Using the public defender, he accepted a plea bargain wherein he was placed on three years of summary probation, conditioned on his enrolling in and completing the three-month AB 541 program, attending the Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) Victim Impact Panel (VIP) and payment of court fees of $390, plus penalties and assessments (total $1,914).
After entering the plea and promising to complete the obligations above, the client moved to North Carolina.
He spoke to several private attorneys about how he could fulfill the requirements of probation from North Carolina and one attorney told him to take the AB 541 program online and to also do the MADD VIP program online. The attorney who told him this did not tell our client that he needed judicial approval before doing so, so the client did both the program and the class online. However, he never filed it with the court.
The client also did not pay the court fines or fees.
Four years after entering his plea, his employer advised him that he had a bench warrant out of Fullerton Superior Court and that if he did not take care of this, he would be asked to resign his job.
The client then called Greg Hill & Associates and explained the situation. Greg responded by asking the client to forward him the proof of completion of the AB 541 program and the MADD VIP, but cautioned that since the judge never approved of him taking the class online, the judge certainly could refuse to accept such documents as fulfilling his plea bargain.
Greg then suggested that he could appear in the Fullerton Court with such documents and a check for the full amount of court fees outstanding and then ask the judge to recall and quash the bench warrant. Greg said that if the client has the full amount of court fees, ready to pay, judges often are more agreeable to recalling the warrant. However, since four years had passed, the judge could also be quite mad and insist that the client appear in person to admit the probation violation and be sentenced to some punishment for the violation.
In other words, Greg told the client that the judge might reject Greg’s request to appear on the client’s behalf to have the warrant recalled and then, the bench warrant would remain outstanding and the client would lose his job.
The client decided to retain Greg and give him all documents, plus $1,914 to pay the Fullerton Superior Court for his outstanding court fines and fees.
Greg then appeared in the Fullerton Superior Court, armed with the aforementioned documents and a check written out to “Clerk of the Court” (this is how a payment to the Orange County Superior Court is made) for the full amount owed.
The judge assigned to rule on the bench warrant then called the matter, recognizing Greg from a prior motion to suppress evidence that Greg had granted. The judge was extremely cordial and recalled the warrant, allowed the client’s online classes to satisfy the terms of probation, accepted the $1,914 payment and then deemed the terms of probation fully satisfied. He then terminated probation for our client.
Our client was overjoyed at the results and looked forward to having the conviction expunged now that probation had ended.
For more information about probation violation issues, please click on the following articles:
- Three Month Lapse Between Arrest and Probation Violation Hearing Does Not Violate One’s Right to a Timely Hearing
- What Punishment Do I Face for a Probation Violation?
- What Happens at a Probation Violation Hearing?