Downey, Under 21, 0.17% BAC, Plea to 3 Month Program

Our client, age 20, was lost and driving her car southbound on the 605 Freeway near the intersection with the 5 Freeway.  It was about 2:30 a.m. and she was returning from a party.  As she approached the turnoff for the southbound 5, knowing she was lost, her confusion suddenly cleared and she realized where she was.  She avoided going south on the 5, but did so by making a quick lane change that caught the eye of a CHP officer just behind her.
Synopsis:  Downey, Underage Driver with a BAC of 0.17%, Negotiated to Three Month DUI Program.
Coincidentally, as the CHP officer pulled over our client, he did so to an area where another CHP officer had just pulled over another motorist.  Therefore, our client was “handed off” to the second CHP officer. 

This meant that the officer who ultimately wrote the police report did not have personal knowledge of our client’s driving and thus had to report it based on what the first officer told him.  This is textbook “double hearsay” barred from admission even in a DMV hearing, according to McNary v. DMV (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 688, quoting Imachi v. DMV (1992) 2 Cal.App.4th 809, 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 478.

The CHP officer had both motorists complete the Field Sobriety Tests at the same time, a significant violation of CHP protocol, especially since immediately after the test he gave each motorist a breathalyzer test.  In proceeding as he did, the CHP officer violated section 1219.3 of Title 17 of the California Code, which requires that, “. . . The breath sample shall be collected only after the subject has been under continuous observation for at least fifteen minutes prior to collection of the breath sample, during which time the subject must not have ingested alcoholic beverages or other fluids, regurgitated, vomited, eaten, or smoked.”  This section was recognized by our courts, too, at People v. Sandra Molenda (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 974.

Here, our client could not have been under continuous observation for fifteen minutes unless the officer could watch both motorists exclusively at the same time, which is what the CHP officer claimed at our client’s DMV hearing.  Moreover, our client suffered from GERD, which caused her to release stomach gas continuously and which can affect the reading of the breathalyzer machine quite a bit.

The field sobriety tests, most of which involve balance, were also conducted under windy conditions on the sloped side of the 605 Freeway.

Greg Hill brought these facts to the District Attorney’s attention, who refused to consider such issues at all and offered our client a nine month alcohol awareness program as well as fines well in excess of the minimums allowed.  Greg Hill therefore went to the District Attorney’s supervisor, who lowered the terms of the plea bargain offered to a three month alcohol awareness program and minimal fines (plus penalties and assessments).

Our client gladly accepted the offer, appreciating that were she to go to trial, the judge might impose significantly more severe terms if she was convicted.

For more information about GERD, field sobriety tests and the mouth alcohol defense to DUI, click on the following articles:
  1. What Is GERD and How Does It Affect DUI?
  2. What Do DUI Field Sobriety Tests (FST’s) Actually Show?
  3. What Is the “Mouth Alcohol” Defense to DUI?
Watch our video about DUI by clicking here.
 
Contact us.

Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him. S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards, L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help. V.L., Carson
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot. C.R., Pomona
★★★★★