Which County Will Prosecute - Crime Happened in 2 Counties?
This is a significant issue because the various counties have significant differences in how they punish narcotics offenses. However, other offenses also have widely varying punishment, too.In a Nutshell: In a case where a police decoy in Ventura County agrees to buy heroin from someone located in Los Angeles County, venue was proper in Ventura County although the exchange of money for the drug and the delivery of the drug took place in Los Angeles County.
Penal Code § 777 gives some direction on this issue. It states that “the jurisdiction of every public offense is in any competent court within the jurisdictional territory of which it is committed. Penal Code § 781 also clarifies the answer, saying that when the acts or effects constituting a requisite to the consummation of the offense take place in two counties, the jurisdiction for prosecution of such an offense is in either county.
The heroin was then delivered in Los Angeles County. In our experience, Ventura County is a far harsher place to be prosecuted than in Los Angeles County. For example, in a misdemeanor DUI prosecution, in Ventura County one is sentenced to formal probation, which is expensive and can be quite onerous. Los Angeles County, in contrast, in a misdemeanor DUI prosecution, informal or summary probation is the standard and it is free.
Chavarria was charged and convicted of selling heroin and having the drug for sale, in violation of Health and Safety Code §§ 11357 and 11352 (a). He was also convicted of violating Health and Safety Code § 11352.5(1) and Penal Code § 1203.07(a)(1) because the heroin at issue weighed more than 14.25 grams. He was sentenced to three years in county jail.
Chavarria then appealed the conviction to the Second Appellate District based on improper venue, meaning the case was in the wrong court. Chavarria contended that Los Angeles County was the proper venue.
The Second Appellate District, in People v. Joshua Chavarria (2013 DJDAR 2509), found the Ventura County court was a proper place for the charges, and thus, the conviction was properly reached in Ventura County.
Thus, Chavarria could have been prosecuted in either Los Angeles or Ventura County. The actual exchange of the $600 for eleven grams of heroin, as well as another sale, took place in Los Angeles County in the Van Nuys/Sherman Oaks area.
The appellate court noted that Penal Code § 781 has been considered remedial in nature and thus the court would construe it liberally to achieve its purpose. The court referenced People v. Posey (2004) 32 Cal.4th 193, wherein a drug sale was made under similar circumstances in Marin County and San Francisco County, but was arranged over the phone with Posey calling from Marin County.
The Chavarria court thought Posey was analogous and thus instructive, especially because Posey was decided by the California Supreme Court. The California Supreme Court reasoned that 781 should be interpreted liberally to include preparatory acts such as those by Posey. In both Posey and Chavarria, the preparatory phone call was necessary for negotiating the price and arranging for the actual exchange of money for narcotics.
For more information about general criminal case filing issues, click on the following articles: