What’re the Deadlines Related to a Right to a Speedy Trial?

Every accused has the right to a resolution of the accusation in a manner without delay in the investigation or delay in prosecution.  Having a pending, unresolved charge against one is risky in that evidence helpful to defendant may be lost or destroyed and witnesses exonerating to defendant may have fading memories or may lose contact or even pass away.

Indeed, undue unreasonable delays in an investigation or prosecution may violate an accused’s constitutional right to a speedy trial and can support a motion terminating the action or for sanctions under Penal Code § 686.  Similarly, the prosecution has a right to a speedy trial (California Constitution Article I, § 29).

It is important to distinguish between preaccusation delay and postaccusation delay.  Preaccusation delay arises during the time between the alleged commission of the offense and the time when defendant is actually charged or arrested, whichever comes first.  This is a due process issue addressed in both the federal and state constitution (U.S Constitution, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; California Constitution, Article I, § 7).

Postaccusation delay occurs after the filing of the accusatory pleading or arrest of defendant.  This period of time is addressed by the Sixth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, and the California Constitution, Article I, § 15.
 
The level of proof needed to successfully request dismissal varies by the type of delay and the type of case, as well as the applicable statute of limitations (Penal Code §§ 799 to 805), when the arraignment took place, when the preliminary hearing took place, when the information was filed in superior court and when trial took place, as well as if defendant ever “waived time,” meaning he or she waived his right to a speedy trial.

So what are the bright-line deadlines one should keep in mind from the outset?  The following list is really just a start, and not meant to be an all-inclusive list (and do not apply if defendant waives time, fails to appear in court, there is a new trial ordered, there is a finding that defendant is incompetent to stand trial, or a writ is filed during the time):
  1. 30 calendar days for a misdemeanor defendant in custody from the time of arraignment or entry of plea, whichever occurs later, to trial (Penal Code § 1382(a)(3));
  2. 45 calendar days for a misdemeanor defendant not in custody from the time of arraignment or entry of plea, whichever occurs later, to trial (Penal Code § 1382(a)(3));
  3. 15 calendar days for felony information to filed if defendant is held to answer after a preliminary hearing (Penal Code § 1382(a)(1));
  4. 60 calendar days for trial after filing of information or finding or indictment for a felony defendant regardless of if defendant is in custody or out of custody on bail (Penal Code § 1382(a)(2));
  5. 10 calendar days for trial after defendant announces ready for trial or object to further delay once felony or misdemeanor defendant consents that trial be continued beyond statutory limits (Penal Code § 1382(a)(2)(B))
  6. 90 calendar days for trial for a defendant serving time in state prison or in county jail for a term of longer than 90 days, who makes a proper demand to be brought to trial on another pending state case (Penal Code § 1381);
  7. 90 calendar days for trial for a person serving time in federal prison in California who makes a valid demand to be brought to trial in a pending state court case (90 days after the prosecutor receives the demand and federal authorities consent to release the prisoner for trial on California charges) (Penal Code § 1381.5); and
  8. 180 calendar days for trial for a person serving time in any state that is a signatory to the Interstate Compact on Detainers who makes a valid demand for trial (within 180 days after delivery of the demand to the prosecuting attorney and court) (Penal Code § 1389).
Contact us.
Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him. S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards, L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help. V.L., Carson
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot. C.R., Pomona
★★★★★