Torrance, Client Going 55 in 25 MPH Zone, 0.12% BAC, No Jail

Our client, age 40 and with no prior criminal history, was arrested shortly after midnight as she followed her friend through a residential neighborhood, allegedly at 55 miles per hour.  The Torrance Police Officers who wrote the report claimed she ran a stop sign, too.
Summary:  Torrance, Speeding 55 in a 25 MPH Zone, Running Stop Sign, BAC 0.12%, 60 Days Jail Eliminated.
Police officers arrested each our Client and her friend.  Our Client indeed had consumed some alcohol (she believed two glasses of wine), but her breath test results of a 0.12% BAC were lower than her blood test results from a sample taken over an hour later. 

While such a phenomena is not unusual if the breath test is taken before the alcohol is fully absorbed, i.e. usually within twenty minutes of drinking, this was not the facts in this case.  Our client was not administered a breath test until after her friend was fully examined at the scene, which took approximately 30 minutes.  Then our Client was not tested for another ten minutes. 

In other words, either the alcohol level in her system had forty minutes to descend or rise, depending upon the timing of her last drink, which was at the Firehouse in downtown Lomita.  In forty minutes, someone’s blood alcohol level (BAC) can descend approximately 0.01% or raise easily from below 0.08% to 0.12% if the last drink was consumed just before leaving a bar.

Greg Hill argued that neither set of alcohol results should be trusted.  The breath test results at the scene could not be trusted because the dispatch log and the police report showed the examining officer only waited about ten minutes before administering the breath test, which violates the fifteen minute minimum observation period required under Title 17 of the California Code.

Greg Hill then argued that the blood alcohol test results were unreliable because there was absolutely no chain of custody and the laboratory technician who supposedly analyzed the blood did not sign the results strip for over 24 hours following the chemical examination.  A chain of custody is required under Title 17 as well as Bullcomings v New Mexico, a recent U.S. Supreme Court case concerning blood tests in DUI cases.

While the District Attorney did not agree with such arguments, or at least would not admit to such an agreement, she agreed to dismiss three counts of the Complaint, two of which dealt with speeding (Vehicle Code § 22350) and failure to stop at a stop sign (Vehicle Code § 22450(a)).  By dismissing these charges, the DA removed the 60 days of county jail that would otherwise be required as part of the plea bargain.

The District Attorney refused to further negotiate on this case and our client declined to press the matter at trial, so our Client accepted the improved plea bargain, which included a three month alcohol awareness program, fines of $390, plus penalties and assessments, attendance at a Mothers Against Drunk Driving meeting, a Hospital and Morgue program and installation of an Interlock Ignition Device.  Such terms were the minimum terms allowed for a first time DUI in Torrance.

For more information about a rising BAC defense, a first time DUI and an IID, click on the following articles:
  1. What Is a “Rising BAC” Defense to DUI?
  2. What Punishment Do I Face for First-Time DUI?
  3. Every Question About an Ignition Interlock Device (I.I.D.) That You Had, but Were Scared to Ask
Watch our video about DUI by clicking here.
 
Contact us.

Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him.
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards,
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help.
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot.
★★★★★