Our client was arrested as she was walking from a small, very expensive women’s clothing boutique near the Manhattan Beach Pier. She had been in the store and tried on some clothes in the dressing room. A worker noticed that our client had gone into the dressing room with five items of clothing and came out with two.
Synopsis: Manhattan Beach, client allegedly shoplifts $2,249 of product, charged with grand theft and commercial burglary, case resolved for three years summary probation and community service, no fines.
The Manhattan Beach Police Department stopped our client as she was walking to her car. The police could see inside the car that there was clothing laying in the backseat of the car and demanded that our client open the car to inspect the clothing. The client initially said no, but police incorrectly threatened, “We can arrest you right now if we want” and the client opened the car door.
A store employee stood by as police brought out the clothing from the car. The store employee quickly claimed that it was all from the boutique and stolen, although there were no price tags on the items and our client insisted she had purchased such items from other stores.
As it turned out, the store manager recently had gotten in a fight with our client’s best friend and our client was means to the store manager evening the score after the fight.
Manhattan Beach Retail Shops
Our client, age 21 and a full-time college student, was charged with misdemeanor grand theft (Penal Code § 487), as the value of the allegedly stolen items exceeded $950, and misdemeanor commercial burglary (Penal Code § 459). She had a prior criminal history for DUI and presenting a fake I.D. to a police officer.
Our client then hired Greg Hill & Associates to defend her. Greg Hill & Associates immediately dispatched an employee to the boutique in Manhattan Beach at issue and gave the store a demand to preserve evidence, specifically all inventory records that would show the items found in the client car were previously in the store’s inventory and not sold, as well as any store security tapes that might corroborate the prior thefts alleged.
At the arraignment, Greg Hill discussed the unlawful search of the client’s car as a Fourth Amendment violation and the fact that the store failed to show that any of the items recovered from our client’s car in fact were in inventory at the store earlier and not marked as sold.
After several court appearances in the Torrance Superior Court, one after which Greg Hill filed a motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code § 1538.5 for the warrantless search of the client’s car, Greg Hill was able to persuade the prosecution to dismiss the grand theft charge and reduce the commercial burglary charge to petty theft (Penal Code § 484(a)). The prosecution only did so on condition that our client withdraw the motion to suppress evidence, which would have dismissed the case. The prosecution commented that she thought the motion would be denied, but did not want to risk losing on it either. Moreover, the prosecution said that if our client did not withdraw the motion, she would file additional charges for trespassing and shoplifting.
Our client then agreed to withdraw the motion. In response, the prosecutor then reduced the 30 days in county jail to ten days of community service. The client accepted the offer, happy to avoid county jail and a grand theft conviction.
For more information about the issues in this theft offense case summary, click on the following articles:
- What Is Commercial Burglary (Penal Code § 459) and What Are the Defenses?
- What Is Shoplifting and Its Defenses?
- What Is Summary Probation?
For more information about theft and robbery crimes, please click here
to watch our theft offenses video.Contact us.