Long Beach, 0.23% BAC, Case Dismissed by Judge on Motion

Our client, age 35, left a Long Beach bar on Pine Avenue.  She exited the parking lot and was heading west on Ocean Boulevard toward the 710 Freeway.  It was raining lightly and the roads were wet.  It was about thirty minutes past midnight.

As the light on Ocean turned green, our client moved forward in her compact SUV.  A Long Beach Police Department deputy was one car behind her and in the lane to her right.
Synopsis:  Long Beach, Our Client Blows a 0.23%  BAC, Case Dismissed by Judge on Our Motion to Suppress.
Our client accelerated, but carefully because of the wet roads.  As anyone familiar with the area will know, the traffic lights in this area are close to each other and phased to keep traffic slow.

Three short blocks later, a mere 0.3 miles, he pulled her over, allegedly for speeding.

The police officer was obviously having fun with this traffic stop, as our client was very attractive and wearing high heels.  Despite light rain, he had our client perform field sobriety tests in the rain.  When our client asked to take off her five inch heels, the officer said “no.”

Yet this show of power paled compared to what he wrote in the police report.  The officer wrote that he observed our client accelerate to 50 miles per hour.  He then caught up to her and paced her to estimate her speed.  He then activated his overhead lights and pulled her over.  This was all in 0.3 miles, or about 500 yards.

The client was arrested and had to spend a night in jail.  She missed work the following day.  She was extremely upset because she knew she could not have reached fifty miles per hour, been paced and then pulled over in such a short distance.

The next day, she called up Greg Hill (on a Sunday) and met with him the same day.  Greg listened to her story and explained that it seemed unlikely an officer could have properly paced our client because standard protocol for pacing, as set forth by the National Highway Safety Administration, the protocol taught police officers at the police academy, is to pace a vehicle for a minimum of ten seconds. 

At fifty miles per hour, a car travels about 75 feet per second.  So for the officer to have performed even a minimally proper pace, he would have had to follow the client’s car for 75 feet times ten, or 750 feet.  That alone is over 0.1 miles.  The time for our client to accelerate to fifty miles per hour, even under optimal conditions, would be another 0.1 miles and then to notice the overhead lights (to respond) and then pull over would also be at least another 0.1 miles.

Greg Hill prepared a Motion to Suppress for an order excluding all evidence gathered after the stop.  The motion’s legal basis was that the officer lacked a reasonable suspicion to make a traffic stop because the statements in the police report certainly were fabricated, as it is impossible for a car to so accelerate, be paced and then pull over all in 0.3 miles.

At the hearing on the Motion to Suppress, the arresting officer added to his poor credibility by claiming he paced our client for a whole block.  This made our client’s motion only stronger.

The officer further testified that he pulled over our client because her speed exceeded the posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour.  The judge then asked the prosecution to produce a current traffic survey for the area of Ocean Boulevard, to show that the posted speed limit was valid.

The prosecution was unable to do so and the Court granted our motion, dismissing the case.

Our client was relieved and very happy. 

For more information about traffic stops for DUI, click on the following articles:
  1. 10 Things to Do If Police Stop You for DUI
  2. Traffic Stop Ruled Improper and Evidence Seized by Police Suppressed When officer Lacked Reasonable Suspicion to Stop Driver
  3. Was There a Bad Cop on Your Case? What Is a Pitchess Motion?
Contact us.
Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him. S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards, L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help. V.L., Carson
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot. C.R., Pomona
★★★★★