Hermosa Beach, Urinating in Parking Lot, Infraction, $515
After the game ended, he decided to walk home, which was an apartment about ten blocks south toward Redondo Beach. It was about 11:00 p.m. He went out of the bar’s back door to the cool night air and felt the urge to urinate. He was standing in the ground-level, old parking lot to the south of Pier Plaza.Without All the Details, What Happened?: Client, age 23, caught urinating in public in parking lot in Hermosa Beach; issued citation for a misdemeanor violation of Penal Code § 372; case resolved for infraction and total fine of $515.
Without even telling our client what he had done wrong, the officer then wrote out a ticket for violating Penal Code § 372 (“Public Nuisance”). The client took the ticket without contesting what he had done. The client signed a promise to appear in Torrance Superior Court in about eight weeks. No more than ten words were said between the officer and our client.
Greg recommended that the client attend 30 Alcoholic Anonymous (AA) meetings before the arraignment, which was a further two months away. Greg explained that the Hermosa Beach City Prosecutor would most likely view such attendance at AA meetings favorably and, in response, amend the complaint to allege a violation of Penal Code § 374.3, which is public dumping, or littering, as an infraction only.
The client in fact did attend 30 AA meetings and provided Greg the sign-in sheet prior to the arraignment. Greg then showed the Hermosa Beach City Prosecutor the sign-in sheet and she agreed to amend the complaint to allege an infraction-level violation of Penal Code § 374.3. She agreed to lower the fine to $150, plus penalties and assessments. This fine totaled $515.
The case was then called and the Hermosa Beach City Prosecutor did amend the complaint to allege the infraction while dismissing the misdemeanor charge of violating Penal Code § 372.
The client was happy with this, as he had his first job out of college and was worried about his employer finding out about a misdemeanor on his record, as well as being on probation, even if just informal probation, for two or three years, as employers believe an employee on probation may violate the terms of probation, be arrested by police and then miss work indefinitely, disrupting the business. Some employers are also concerned that police may report to the place of employment in uniform to speak with the employee on probation, causing customers to mistakenly suspect police are investigating the business.
For more information about the issues in this public urination case summary, click on the following articles: