Can I Reduce My Misdemeanor to an Infraction? If so, How?
Under Penal Code § 19.8(a), a person charged with or convicted of certain misdemeanors may request that the judge reclassify the charge as an infraction.
Brief Synopsis: This article lays out which offenses can be charged as either a misdemeanor or infraction and briefly outlines the advantages and disadvantages of seeking reduction of the misdemeanor to an infraction either before or after a conviction.
Which misdemeanor offenses are eligible? These are the most common offenses:
- Fighting in public or disturbing the peace (Penal Code § 415);
- Petty theft of property valued at $50 or less (Penal Code § 490.1);
- Trespass (Penal Code §§ 555 and 602(n));
- Failure to appear (FTA) (Penal Code § 853.7 or § 40508);
- Driving without a license (Vehicle Code § `12500);
- Engaging in an exhibition of speed (Vehicle Code § 23109(c));
- Driving on a suspended license or revoked for certain reasons (Vehicle Code § 14601.1); and
- Underage drinking (Business & Professions Code §§ 25658(b), 25658.5, 25661 and 25662);
- Gambling offenses described in Penal Code § 330;
- Appropriation of lost property in violation of Penal Code § 485;
- Performing body-piercing on a minor (Penal Code § 652);
- Manufacturing, producing or distributing counterfeit sports trading cards (Business & Professions Code § 21672);
- Attempting to record an unrecordable document (Government Code § 27204);
- Selling a substandard vehicle exhaust system (Vehicle Code § 27150.1);
- Failure to comply with a court order to attend traffic school (Vehicle Code § 42005); and
- Relinquishing a motor vehicle to a minor under the circumstances listed in Penal Code § 193.8.
If the judge grants such a request, this can be beneficial for background or criminal history searches, insofar as many such companies only screen for misdemeanors and felonies. A person may appear more attractive to an employer without a misdemeanor on his or her criminal history.
Similarly, if the charge is pending, it is rare for the district attorney to represent the People of the State of California in the trial of an infraction. However, the judge cannot take the prosecution’s place. People v. Daggett (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 253 Cal.Rptr. 195.
However, if the case is still pending, there are tactical reasons not to seek such a reduction. This is because an infraction is punishable only by a fine (the maximum is $250), not imprisonment in county jail or prison. As such, a person charged with an infraction has fewer constitutional rights than a misdemeanor (People v. Sava (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 935, 939, 235 Cal.Rptr. 694), which can be significant. These include the right to a jury trial, the right to a speedy trial (and the right to bring a Serna motion) and the right to a public defender (however, a defendant can hire a private attorney to appear on his behalf in an infraction under Penal Code §§ 19.7 and 977(a)).
Therefore, we suggest that while the case is pending (subject to the two exceptions listed in the last paragraph below), allow it to remain a misdemeanor if any of these rights are significant given your case facts. Then, after the plea to the charge, seek reduction to an infraction.
There are certainly exceptions to this, the most significant being that if one has professional licensing issues, a plea to a misdemeanor can result in suspension of one’s professional license or being placed on probation by the licensing board. The other significant exception is if one is not a U.S. citizen, a plea to certain misdemeanors can constitute commission of a crime of moral turpitude, which could result in deportation proceedings. Therefore, we strongly suggest one speak to an experienced criminal defense attorney before boldly proceeding with reduction of an infraction or deciding to wait, as the consequences can be life-changing.
For more information about reducing charges to a lower level, please click on the following articles: