What Is a Pretext Call in a Sex Offense Case & Why Is It Dangerous?
Other times, a victim or the victim’s family reports something that took place weeks, months or even more than a year ago. In such case, there usually is no evidence of this except the victim’s claim. It is a classic “he said she said” situation. Police may believe the victim, but as part of their due diligence in investigating the claim, they need corroboration from the suspect before recommending prosecution.Brief Synopsis: A pretext call is a “trap” phone call from the alleged victim to the suspect, usually in a sex case, wherein the police record the call and the victim is coached by the police into trying to get the suspect to confess or apologize for certain conduct. The police usually orchestrate the call and the suspect is unaware that the police are listening to the conversation.
A pretext call is one way to accomplish this. The cooperative victim or a witness to the act will make a telephone call to the suspect, with the police recording the call and sitting with the caller. Penal Code § 633 makes recording such a call legal, although in general recording a phone call without the consent of both parties is illegal.
The contact can also be through e-mail or text messages.
The victim will attempt to confront the victim about the conduct, often asking, “why did you have sex with me after I told you no?” or “You know you hurt me really bad.” The victim may also say she or he is having nightmares or insomnia. The victim may also suggest counseling that the two can go to “to work through this issue.” The goal is to elicit incriminating statements such as admissions or apologies. The victim may cry or become emotional during the call, which can push the suspect into a response.
Sometimes, the victim is too traumatized to make the call, so a police officer may make the call, posing as a friend of the victim. This may or may not be possible if the suspect recognizes the voice of the friend.
The call can come days or weeks after the victim comes to first see the police. Often times, if the call is many weeks later, or even months later, the suspect may let down his or her guard, thinking he or she “got away with it” and be more willing to admit to the conduct.
The call could come on a birthday or an anniversary date of some event, so as to make the suspect more trusting of the caller’s motives (or gullible in confessing). The caller may even announce to the suspect, if the allegations support this, that she is pregnant (a lie) and wanted to tell the suspect this.
The call is often made late at night, well after what one would expect to be “working hours” or when the suspect is at work early in the morning, if the suspect and victim had a habit of talking to each other early in the morning.
Later, the police will often use the call as leverage against the suspect, asking the suspect to elaborate on his conduct “since you already admitted to the crime anyways.”
When our office is contacted by a suspect in such a case, one of our first questions is whether he or she has spoken to the alleged victim since the incident. Sometimes, unfortunately, the potential client has already spoken to the alleged victim.
When such a conversation has not taken place, we warn the client about such a “pretext call” that could come. We tell him or her that it is a trick call, or a trap. We mention that the contact could also come in the form of a text message, a Facebook message or an e-mail. We advise the potential client to immediately just hang up. Anything he or she says can be twisted around, even silence if a normal person would have strongly denied the accusation.
The critical thing that the potential client must understand is that such a call can be extremely dangerous. Anything he says can be characterized as a confession. The police could use trick questions for the alleged victim to ask, so the smartest thing for any suspect to do is simply hang up immediately. This may make the police question the credibility of the alleged victim.
For more information about sex offense cases, click on the following articles:
Contact Greg Hill & Associates
- Does a Sex Crime Defendant Have the Right to Present Evidence of Alleged Victim’s Prior False Sexual Assault Claims?
- Court Decides California Sex Offender Law Is Unconstitutional by Barring Those Convicted of Misconduct with Persons Under 14 from Relief from PC 290 Registration
- Irvine’s Ordinance Barring Sex offenders From Entering Parks Without Permission is Unconstitutional and Violates California Law