Should I Waive a Jury Trial and Instead Have a Bench Trial?

In many cases, especially when the crime is publicly scorned (i.e. DUI, domestic violence, animal cruelty, sex offenses) yet a bona-fide defense exists, one should consider waiving a jury trial.  The case is then tried to only the judge.  This can make it easier to focus the case on evidence and argument that matters most toward a not guilty verdict, rather than spending a lot of time and effort persuading twelve jurors to put aside their biases.  

A bench trial may also be a prudent choice when a defendant’s appearance suggests membership in a gang, i.e. numerous tattoos, and gang activity is an issue.  Likewise, when the defendant looks like a heavy drug user and sales or possession is an issue, a bench trial may be better than a jury trial.  A judge may also be less emotionally swayed by certain evidence than would a jury.

A bench trial is also faster and the judge often returns a “finding” (the functional equivalent of a verdict) much quicker than in a jury trial.  A quicker trial also means the trial is less expensive for the defendant if he has private counsel.

Generally speaking, a bench trial is advantageous really in only a small percentage of trials.  A jury trial is usually heavily favored by most defendants because it allows twelve persons, rather than one, to determine witness credibility and, in some cases, unreasonable conduct by police.  Some people consider a jury trial a right against government oppression. Defendants generally trust that a jury will acquit or render a not guilty verdict more often (than a judge).  The O.J. trial certainly validated this belief.

Both the defendant and the People have the right to a jury trial in misdemeanor and felony trials (California Constitution, Article I, § 16 and Penal Code § 699).  In a felony case, a jury consists of twelve persons.  However, in a misdemeanor case, the parties may agree to less than twelve jurors, but no fewer than six.  Normally, however, a misdemeanor jury will consist of twelve jurors.

A jury trial, however, is not available in all cases.  The general principle is that a jury trial is a right whenever incarceration is possible if the defendant is found guilty.  One exception to this is for misdemeanor possession of marijuana (Health and Safety Code § 11357(b)).  If one is charged with this, there is no possibility of incarceration (Tracy v. Municipal Court (1978) 22 Cal.3d 760, 150 Cal.Rtpr. 785), but defendant does have the right to a jury trial.  

There is no right to a jury trial in a matter for civil contempt, infractions, and various sub-issues that are necessary for the prosecution.  These include whether the defendant has a prior conviction, whether the alleged prior offenses is “serious” or “violent,” competency trials under Penal Code § 1368, and the issue of venue for a criminal case.

If one seeks to waive a jury trial, both the defendant and the prosecution must so consent.  The defendant himself, not just his attorney, must waive his rights to jury trial.  The judge must assure that the defendant’s waiver is done intelligently and expressly.  A defendant’s silence as to this issue does not suffice.  When the defendant is emotionally disturbed, the court must carefully scrutinize the waiver to ensure the defendant is physically and emotionally capable to do so.  

In cases when the defendant has pled not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI), defendant may still be capable of waiving the right to jury trial.  There is no presumption against a knowing and intelligent waiver just because the defendant alleging NGI also seeks to waive a jury trial.

For more information about issues related to trial issues, click on the following articles:
  1. What Is a Trial Tax?
  2. Plea Bargaining by a Judge Is Illegal.
  3. What Should I Wear and Bring to Court?
Contact Greg Hill & Associates
 
Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him. S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards, L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help. V.L., Carson
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot. C.R., Pomona
★★★★★