Should I Waive a Jury Trial and Instead Have a Bench Trial?
A bench trial may also be a prudent choice when a defendant’s appearance suggests membership in a gang, i.e. numerous tattoos, and gang activity is an issue. Likewise, when the defendant looks like a heavy drug user and sales or possession is an issue, a bench trial may be better than a jury trial. A judge may also be less emotionally swayed by certain evidence than would a jury.In a Nutshell: A trial with a jury is recommended in certain types of cases, but not in others. When defendant wants to keep a jury away from rendering a ruling on the guilt or innocence of him (or her), a bench trial is the alternative. To read what types of cases are best for a bench trial, read this article.
A bench trial is also faster and the judge often returns a “finding” (the functional equivalent of a verdict) much quicker than in a jury trial. A quicker trial also means the trial is less expensive for the defendant if he has private counsel.
Both the defendant and the People have the right to a jury trial in misdemeanor and felony trials (California Constitution, Article I, § 16 and Penal Code § 699). In a felony case, a jury consists of twelve persons. However, in a misdemeanor case, the parties may agree to less than twelve jurors, but no fewer than six. Normally, however, a misdemeanor jury will consist of twelve jurors.
A jury trial, however, is not available in all cases. The general principle is that a jury trial is a right whenever incarceration is possible if the defendant is found guilty. One exception to this is for misdemeanor possession of marijuana (Health and Safety Code § 11357(b)). If one is charged with this, there is no possibility of incarceration (Tracy v. Municipal Court (1978) 22 Cal.3d 760, 150 Cal.Rtpr. 785), but defendant does have the right to a jury trial.
If one seeks to waive a jury trial, both the defendant and the prosecution must so consent. The defendant himself, not just his attorney, must waive his rights to jury trial. The judge must assure that the defendant’s waiver is done intelligently and expressly. A defendant’s silence as to this issue does not suffice. When the defendant is emotionally disturbed, the court must carefully scrutinize the waiver to ensure the defendant is physically and emotionally capable to do so.
In cases when the defendant has pled not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI), defendant may still be capable of waiving the right to jury trial. There is no presumption against a knowing and intelligent waiver just because the defendant alleging NGI also seeks to waive a jury trial.
For more information about issues related to trial issues, click on the following articles:
Contact Greg Hill & Associates