What Is a “Trial Tax?” Why Should I Consider This?
Clients often ask how the judge will sentence them if they are convicted at trial. The answer to this naturally depends upon how the evidence is presented at trial and, consequently, how culpable the judge considers the client.
Of course, if the client believes he has a good chance of being found not guilty, accepting any offer of punishment is certainly a bitter pill to swallow to avoid the risk of being found guilty. In such circumstances, the client may want to have a jury trial to vindicate his innocence.About This Article Briefly: A trial tax is an increase in punishment from the last plea bargain offered, representing a “tax” to reflect the extra cost imposed on the judicial system for pulling fourteen people (12 jurors and 2 alternates) from their jobs for the duration of the trial and imposing extra stress on the court staff for not accepting the last plea bargain.
Going to trial and trusting a jury is a big decision. After all, the last offer from the prosecution is usually not the same sentence imposed by a judge after trial. Often, the prosecution will propose a plea bargain with terms that are far better than the minimum sentence a judge would have to impose were the client convicted at trial. Therefore, it makes practical sense for the client to accept the offer if he believes he would be convicted.
If the jury finds our client guilty, it is common for the judge to impose a sentence harsher than the last offer from the prosecutor because the client has taken up the judge's time and not been successful in proving his innocence, taken up jurors’ time, imposed costs upon the State of California and taken time away from other cases. Multiple police officers may need to be subpoenaed to trial, which is expensive for the state. Witnesses must come to court, missing work, as well. The sentence is thus the last offer, plus punishment for taxing the system's resources, a "trial tax."
Clients recognize this extra punishment as seeming unfair for exercising one’s constitutional right to a jury trial. Indeed, one has a constitutional right to a jury trial, but that right is not necessarily a right to a free jury trial. This, however, leads to the issue of whether the widespread and well-understood "trial tax" chills one's right to a jury trial, especially if the client is not needlessly clogging up the court with a frivolous or needless trial wherein the client is unrealistically and naively hoping for juror sympathy, scorn for some police officer, some type of legal loophole or a witness to be unavailable at trial.
Our office has gone to jury trial more than once based upon a client’s assurance that a witness will not show up to testify, but then that witness does show up much to our client’s surprise. We have also had witnesses fail to appear that our client promised were willing to come to trial, but in the end abandoned our client.
Returning to the original question of how much one will be sentenced if one goes to trial, there is no easy answer to such a question, as each case is different. There are risks no one can control. Yet being aware of the “trial tax” can help one make a more intelligent decision of whether to go to trial.
For more information about trial and sentencing, click on the following articles:
Contact Greg Hill & Associates