Justia Lawyer Rating
Best Attorneys of America
AVVO
ASLA
Super Lawyers
Superior DUI Attorney 2017
10 Best Law Firms
Top One Percent 2017
AVVO
The National Trial Lawyers
ASLA
ELA
Best of Thervo 2017
NACDA
10 Best Law Firms
Criminal Defense Attorneys

Punishment for Making Annoying Phone Calls or Texts?

With modern technology, we communicate less and less in a face-to-face manner.  We use e-mail, text messages, Twitter (“tweets”), voicemail, Facebook and blogs.  Indeed, many people carry their cell phones with them at all times and sleep with them nearby to receive such messages as soon as possible.  Patience is no longer required to communicate or intrude into another person’s attention.
Brief Synopsis:  Penal Code § 653m(a) and (b) makes it a crime to make annoying phone calls or send annoying texts.  The penalties can range from probation with a protective order to up to six months in county jail and a $1,000 fine, plus penalties and assessments that can total up to $4,4250.
To convey emphasis, there are symbols to add to messages such as a happy face, sad face, exclamation marks, hash-tags, etc.  Modern technology, in a way, enables and encourages emotional outbursts, especially of a positive nature.  

Negative feelings can be strong and because of this, we often trust such feelings.  The adage “trust your intuition” usually suggests that if one suspects something bad, it is probably truly bad or will be eventually revealed as bad.  

Art 285 - Torrance CourthouseTorrance Courthouse

These circumstances have made the ready availability of cell phones a means to harass or annoy another.  It may be in the context of someone who owes another person money such as child support or from a personal loan.  It may be in the context of a broken romantic relationship.  It may be in the context of two feuding neighbors.  It may be in the context of adolescent pranks, often fueled by alcohol or drugs, and often involving sending photographs. The calls or texts may be repeated over and over until a response is received, which may only fuel more calls of texts.  

However, making annoying phone calls or sending annoying texts is illegal.  Penal Code § 653m(a) and (b) prohibits such conduct when the unwelcome calls or texts are meant to and do in fact cause anxiety to the recipient.  

It is important to note the distinction between annoying phone calls or text and making criminal threats (Penal Code § 422) or stalking (Penal Code § 646.9), which are much more serious crimes.  Criminal threats in fact can be charged as a felony strike offense.  Criminal threats involve vowing to injure or even kill another person if the other person does not do certain things or stop doing certain things.  The perpetrator must have the present ability to carry out such threats and the recipient of the threat must be placed in immediate fear for their safety.  A minimum state prison term of sixteen months is the lowest punishment, although for a first time offender, probation is often granted, depending upon the facts.

image description
It is also important to distinguish making annoying phone calls or texts from “sexting,” which is a sex offense and can carry with it severe penalties, the worst of which is perhaps the requirement of a lifetime requirement to register as a sex offender under Penal Code § 290.

In contrast, making annoying phone calls or sending annoying texts is treated by prosecutors with far less urgency.  Nevertheless, it is a misdemeanor offense and punishment is not just a fine.  The maximum punishment one faces for violating Penal Code § 653m(a) or (b) is six months in county jail and / or a fine of up to $1,000, plus penalties and assessments.  

What our office has found in such cases is that prosecutors usually resolve such cases, most of which are first-time offenses for our client, with a protective order in favor of the recipient of such calls or texts, three years of summary probation, 26 or 52 anger management classes, up to thirty days of county jail or community service and a fine of between $150 and $300, depending upon the circumstances.  

Usually, there are many counts, between five and fifty, and an emotionally charged “victim” who expects the prosecution to be zealous.  The “victim” may be active in attending court and may pressure the prosecution not to settle on gentle terms.  

What we suggest our clients do in advance is enroll in an online anger management program.  Anger management is a category of classes that the courts do not designate with “approved providers,” so online classes are usually acceptable.  We also encourage clients to attend AA or NA classes in advance if alcohol or drugs are a factor in the calls or texts.  Taking these steps can help negotiate a resolution of the case on terms that the client can accept, often which are far better than the usual terms.

For more information about criminal threats, which is a more serious form of making annoying phone calls or texts, click on the following articles:
  1. Are Criminal Threats Protected Speech under the First Amendment?
  2. Conviction Reversed for Mailing Criminal Threats
  3. Immigration Consequences of a Plea to Misdemeanor Criminal Threats Are Not Grounds to Vacate a Judgment
Contact Greg Hill & Associates   
Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well." S.A., Torrance
★★★★★
"Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him." S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
"Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards." L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
"Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help." V.L., Carson
★★★★★
"Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot." C.R., Pomona