Prostitution Near U.S.C., East LA Court, PDP & Dismissal
Our client, a candidate for a Ph.D. in electrical engineering and in the United States from Pakistan on a student visa, spoke with a police decoy and agreed to pay her $120 for an hour of “full services.” The woman directed our client to meet her at the Vagabond Inn on Figueroa Avenue just north of U.S.C. She instructed our client to call her once he arrived.Condensed Form: U.S.C. doctoral candidate arranges meeting with prostitute at Vagabond Inn in Los Angeles, case filed in East L.A. Court; case dismissed after client completes prostitution diversion program (PDP).
About an hour later, he arrived at the Vagabond Inn and called the woman’s number. She peered from the window and asked him to describe what he was wearing. She then instructed him to meet her in a specific room.
Our client then went to the room, entered and briefly chatted with the woman. He confirmed $120 for “full services” and showed her the money. Two male police officers from the Los Angeles Police Department vice unit then emerged from the room’s bathroom and detained our client.
The client was then photographed in the hotel room and issued a citation for violation of California Penal Code § 647(b), solicitation of prostitution. He was instructed to sign the ticket as a promise to appear in court in about six weeks.
The client called Greg Hill & Associates, terribly embarrassed and apprehensive about the consequences of the arrest on his student visa. Greg met with him and listened to his story, noting that because of his poor English, “full services” perhaps did not mean the same thing to him as it would to someone who grew up here and was more familiar with the street vernacular terms for the sex acts a prostitute might offer (i.e. “pops,” “Greek bb,” “bbbj”) or other terms they use such as “roses,” etc. However, the fact that he used certain “prostitution slang” also suggested he had patronized prostitutes in the past.
Greg then appeared in the East Los Angeles Superior Court and read the police report, which was quite ambiguous as to what our client agreed to pay for. While our client did not bring cards to the hotel room or intend to take the prostitute to a concert at the Hollywood Bowl, the police report did not say that sex was offered in exchange for money.
This was a good offer in light of a recent trend in the East Los Angeles Court to stop offering such deals. The recent trend was to make the johns plead no contest to the Penal Code § 647(b) charge, meaning to convict them, place the individual on three years of informal, or summary probation. make him (or her!) pay a $250 fine and then attend an AIDS Education and Testing Program. This meant that the person would have a conviction on their record, a scar that could ruin employment opportunities, promotions and cause embarrassment.
This made the offer to our client meaningful in that regard, although five years ago such an offer would have been routine and nothing special.
Our client accepted the offer, attended the PDP, underwent his AIDS test, did stay out of trouble and the case was dismissed a year later. Along the way, he was awarded his Ph.D. in electrical engineering.
For more information about sex offenses and prostitution in specific, click on the following articles:
Watch our video about sex offenses by clicking here.