Newport Beach, Under Influence of Meth, Retest, Dismissed

At approximately 3:00 a.m. on a weekend morning, our client’s car suffered some type of mechanical failure as our client drove southbound on the 405 near John Wayne Airport.  The car inexplicably coasted to a stop on the side of the freeway.  Our client, thinking the car simply ran out of gas (although the fuel gauge showed there was plenty of gas), called a friend to bring him some gasoline.  The client believed the fuel gauge was broken.
Synopsis:  Newport Beach, Case Dismissed After Re-Test of Substance Irvine Police Claimed Was Positive For Methamphetamine Proves Negative.
Before the friend could arrive, an Irvine Police Officer pulled up behind our client and accused our client of being under the influence of alcohol (it was 3:00 a.m.)..  Our client passed the breathalyzer test just fine, which puzzled the police officer and made him doubly determined to arrest our client for something. 

Our client was wearing only a t-shirt and shorts, so he shivered in the low 50 degree weather after being outside the car for about an hour.  The client was about six feet tall and 135 pounds, so this was expected, but the police interpreted shivering as our client being under the influence of methamphetamine.

So the police officer asked to search the inside of our client’s car, which our client agreed to.  Police then did so and announced he had found methamphetamine spilled all over the inside of the car. 

While our client was indeed high on meth, and even admitted this to the police officer, our client also knew there was no meth in the car.  The police officer, however, gathered up a testable quantity of the white substance (which our client figured could only be spilled sugar or salt from eating fast food in his car).

The police officer then produced a NIK kit from his car, pretended to test the substance and then marched proudly back to our client to show him a blue test result, which indicates a positive test.  Our client was shocked, as the Irvine Police Officer handcuffed him and locked him up.

Bail was set quite high for our client because he had a prior strike, so the arraignment was held the following Monday.  The client’s family called Greg Hill on the weekend and he appeared the following day, the Monday at the arraignment.

Greg Hill asked the District Attorney to re-test the sample, based on the client’s insistence that the Irvine Police Department had made a mistake.

The re-test was performed with negative results.  The astonished District Attorney agreed to dismiss the case in the interests of justice (Penal Code § 1385), not to press forward for a DUI, even though our client had admitted to being under the influence of meth while driving.  Our client was released about twelve hours later.

Our client was vindicated.  His family, who had experienced representation by a public defender several times before, commented that they thought a public defender would not have believed our client and certainly would not have pushed for a second test of the sample.

For more information about drug diversion programs and bad cops (Pitchess Motions), click on the following articles:
  1. Drug Diversion Programs – Prop 36 Versus PC 1000.
  2. Bad Cops and Pitchess Motions.
  3. Prosecutor Can No Longer Evade Disclosing Police Personnel File Data in Response to a Pitchess Motion
Watch our Video about Drug Offenses by clicking here.

Contact us.

Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him. S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards, L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help. V.L., Carson
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot. C.R., Pomona
★★★★★