Bellflower, Shoplifting, Sephora, Civil Compromise Dismissal

Our client was 21 years old and had no prior record.  She was a college student and wanted to go on to medical school.

She was arrested walking out of the Cerritos Mall Sephora store with approximately $400 in makeup in her purse that she had not paid for before leaving the store.  

Sephora quickly called the Lakewood Sheriff’s office, which sent out an officer to arrest our client.

Our client was cooperative and apologetic to the police.

Sephora sent our client a “bill” of nearly $400 for their loss prevention fees, which puzzled our client because Sephora had already recovered all the makeup items that she had in her purse.  She consequently called our office for advice.

In the course of speaking with Greg Hill, she learned that her case might be eligible for dismissal through a diversion program that the Bellflower court had for younger, first-time shoplifters.  Greg had represented many such clients and was familiar with the program.

Greg first wanted to see if the District Attorney would still offer the program.  At the arraignment, the District Attorney indeed made such an offer.  Greg then discussed the offer, which involved our client performing ten days of community service in exchange for a dismissal.  The client agreed to accept the offer of diversion.

When Greg returned to the Bellflower Court, the District Attorney apologized that she could no longer offer diversion because the head DA for the Bellflower Court had changed and the new head DA’s policy was not to extend such diversion offers.  

Greg therefore had a personal meeting with the Head DA on an afternoon to try to get the Head DA to honor the prior offer.  The Head DA refused to make good on the prior offer, insisting that a conviction was proper and even commenting, “it is not that bad.  She is still eligible for expungement in three years.”  If our client were to take a plea bargain involving a conviction for petty theft (Penal Code § 484), she would lose her job as a bank teller.

Greg therefore advised the client to pay the loss prevention fees, which she did and Greg then prepared and filed a Motion for Civil Compromise under Penal Code §§ 1377 and 1378.  Greg had originally not wanted to file such a motion because it required that the client pay the loss prevention fees and there was risk of such a motion being denied, thereby locking our client into a plea bargain involving a conviction.  Diversion would have been preferable for the client, as it was less expensive and less risky.

Greg however filed the motion.  The judge was well aware of the new Head District Attorney’s tough stance and did not appreciate such insensitivity.  The judge consequently granted the Motion for Civil Compromise, dismissing the case.

Our client was very happy.  She kept her record clean and her job, as well as her eligibility for medical school in the future.

For more information about the issues in this theft offense case summary, click on the following articles:
  1. What is a Motion for Civil Compromise?
  2. What is Shoplifting and Its Defenses?
  3. What Can I Do About My Criminal Record on the Internet When The Court Dismissed My Case?
For more information about theft and robbery crimes, please click here to watch our theft offenses video.

Contact us.

Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him.
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards,
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help.
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot.
★★★★★