Marina Del Rey, Shoplifting, Costco, Diversion, Dismissal
Our client went to a nearby Costco in Culver City and grabbed a printer ink cartridge that he needed at home. Without paying for it, he walked out of the store. Within twenty feet of exiting the store, a loss prevention officer from Costco stopped our client.In a Nutshell: Marina Del Rey, client steals $59 ink cartridge from Costco, case dismissed after diversion successfully completed, Airport Courthouse, client not a U.S. citizen.
Costco uses “secret shoppers” to monitor shoplifting at its stores, rather than video surveillance, so such shoppers walking the floor had apparently observed our client walking out of the store without paying for the cartridge.
Our client was then escorted to an upstairs office, where he was asked about his conduct. Our client was confused and decided not to say anything. He had only a minor past criminal record. He was scared about being arrested and being unable to care for this wife, or worse yet, being deported, as he was not a U.S. citizen.
The District Attorney’s office at the Airport Courthouse then filed a criminal complaint against our client, alleging a single count for a violation of Penal Code § 484(a), petty theft (nowadays, with Proposition 47, such conduct falls under it own code section, Penal Code § 459.5, shoplifting).
The client then retained Greg Hill & Associates. Greg Hill met with the client and discussed the facts. The client was extremely worried about serving jail time, as he could then not care for his sick wife, and being deported, as he was not a U.S. citizen and shoplifting was certainly a crime of moral turpitude. The client commented that he did not know what came over him when he was in Costco, explaining that his personal life had been in chaos recently.
Greg Hill had the client complete an online shoplifting prevention program offered by Tom Wilson Counseling Center. The client then provided Greg with the certificate of completion of this prior to the arraignment.
At the arraignment, Greg then discussed the case facts with the handling District Attorney in court, showing her the online shoplifting prevention certificate of completion and explaining the client’s recently tumultuous personal life. Greg had dealt with this particular District Attorney many times in the past and enjoyed good rapport with her.
The District Attorney commented that, normally, diversion in a shoplifting case is reserved for a youthful offender (less than 23 or 24 years old), but because she understood the aberrant nature of the case and that the client seemed to be motivated to get control of his life, she would grant a delayed entry of plea diversion. This form of diversion is best for one with immigration concerns, as the client does not have to first enter a “no contest” plea that the immigration court deems a conviction. This was quite lucky for our client and Greg thanked the prosecutor.
The terms of diversion were that the client would perform 40 hours of approved community service and the case would be dismissed after six months if the client remained out of trouble.
The client then quickly performed the community service near his home and, six months later, the case was dismissed. The client was very happy that he avoided a conviction for a crime of moral turpitude and any conviction otherwise, as he was desperately seeking work as well.
For more information about the issues in this theft offense case summary, click on the following articles:
For more information about theft and robbery crimes, please click here to watch our theft offenses video.