Can Felony Child Endangerment Lead to PC 290 Registration?

Defendant Toni Allexy, age 38, was a high school cheerleading coach.  She invited a fourteen year old football player from the school to her house and encouraged him to drink alcohol with her.  He did so.

After getting the victim drunk and becoming, in her description, “beyond drunk,” she took the victim to her computer room, where alone with just him, she drew her initials on his chest.  She then took off his football jersey, put it on herself, and took a picture of herself sitting in his lap.  She then sent it via text message to the victim’s girlfriend, with the message, “Don’t you wish you were here?”

Ms. Allexy then insisted, over her husband’s objection, on driving the victim home in her truck.  She insisted that he sit in the front seat alongside her.  While driving, she put her hand in the victim’s pants on his penis.  She then stroked his penis as she drove him home.  

Following the incident, the victim fell into a “tail spin.”  He quit school, began drinking alcohol frequently, began using drugs and ran away from his mother’s home.

Ms. Allexy was charged in Butte County Superior Court with six counts, including committing a lewd act on a minor, but accepted a plea bargain to felony child endangerment.  The court sentenced her to four years in state prison, suspended execution of the sentence and placed her on four years of felony probation with the warning that if she violated probation, she would have to register as a sex offender.  Allexy’s counsel accepted the condition.

About a year after being sentenced, Allexy violated probation twice, once for having unauthorized contact with a minor at a skate park and later, for embezzling over $10,000 from her employer.  

Based on Allexy’s poor performance on probation, the judge revoked probation and executed the four year prison sentence, as well as requiring her to register as a sex offender.  

Allexy appealed the court’s order that she register as a sex offender.  The Third Appellate District, in People v. Toni Rae Allexy (2012 DJDAR 4747) agreed with Allexy that the trial court made an error in first imposing the sentence and then later adding on the registration condition.  However, the Appellate Court found that Allexy’s counsel forfeited the right to object to the error, or even invited the error, when he failed to object to this at the time of sentencing.  Moreover, the Appellate Court found beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless.

Indeed, under Penal Code § 290.006, a judge may impose the requirement that one register as a sexual offender if the court finds at the time of sentencing or conviction that the person committed the offence as a result of sexual compulsion or for purposes of sexual gratification.  It does not allow the court to sentence defendant and then decide later whether to require registration.

Naturally, of one were defense counsel for Allexy, it would have seemed poor form for him or her to insist at sentencing that his client be required to register, especially because his client was being spared a four year prison sentence.  As the appellate court commented, it would have been an unwise tactic to point out the court’s error when five counts were being dismissed including committing a lewd act on a minor.  Moreover, had his client complied with the forms of probation, the registration issue would have been moot.

For more information about , click on the following articles:
  1. Conviction Related to Sexting Properly Required Sex Offender Registration
  2. Appellate Court Denies Equal Protection Challenge of Lifetime Sex Offender Registration Requirement for Possession of Child Pornography
  3. Court Decides California Sex Offender Law Is Unconstitutional by Barring Those Convicted of Misconduct with Persons Under 14 from Relief from PC 290 Registration
Contact Greg Hill & Associates
Client Reviews
Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well.
★★★★★
Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him. S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards, L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help. V.L., Carson
★★★★★
Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot. C.R., Pomona
★★★★★