Justia Lawyer Rating
Best Attorneys of America
AVVO
ASLA
Super Lawyers
Superior DUI Attorney 2017
10 Best Law Firms
Top One Percent 2017
AVVO
The National Trial Lawyers
ASLA
ELA
Best of Thervo 2017
NACDA
10 Best Law Firms
Criminal Defense Attorneys

What Is Possession of Marijuana for Sales (H & S 11359)?

About This Article Briefly: A violation of Health & Safety Code § 11379, possession of marijuana for sales, is no longer a felony after Prop 64 was passed.  A violation of Health & Safety Code § 11379 by someone 21 or older without a license from the local city or county to sell marijuana, is now a misdemeanor.
Possession of marijuana for purposes of sales can be a confusing felony to defend.  On one hand, California recognizes a medical recommendation for the use of marijuana and permits the possession of up to 8 ounces by an individual.  On the other hand, police officers will often arrest someone on suspicion of possessing marijuana for sales when the amount of marijuana found is only two ounces, or even less we have seen.  The prosecutor will then file the case against such an individual.  How can these two circumstances rightfully exist?

The answer lies in the additional evidence found with a person having only 40 grams, for example, of marijuana.  Is the marijuana separately packaged in smaller bags?  Are there additional empty, clean baggies nearby?  Does the client have a working (operational) digital scale?  Does the client have a pay-owe sheet?  Does the client have a bunch of money in small denominations?  How about more than one cell phone?  Does one cell phone have texts asking to buy and sell “trees?”  Does the person arrested have drug paraphernalia with him?

Long Beach CourthouseLong Beach Courthouse

It merits mention that a medical recommendation to use marijuana is no defense to a charge of sales (People v. Lewis Marcus Dowl (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 702).

However, before one enters the thicket of debating whether the marijuana is for personal use or sales, it is smart to begin the defense with the more fundamental question of whether defendant had possession of the marijuana.  Possession can be actual or constructive.  Actual possession involves having the marijuana in one’s pocket, in one’s hands or in a back pack or bag defendant is carrying.  Constructive possession can be having the marijuana in an area of one’s house where no one else goes, i.e. one’s top dresser drawer, or paying for the marijuana and expecting it to be delivered shortly.

The client must also be aware of the presence of the marijuana and that it is illegal, i.e. the client lacks a medical marijuana recommendation for the quantity (less than eight ounces) or that the marijuana is intended to be sold.  The client may not be aware that there is marijuana, i.e. the client is borrowing a car and the marijuana was in a baggie such that its odor was undetectable.

Possession, incidentally, is usually not the main area of controversy because marijuana.  The main area of debate is whether it was intended for sales.

Circumstantial evidence, after all, can be misleading.  Some users, for example, carry with them a small digital scale to weigh the marijuana they buy to ensure they are not being charged too much.  Some users will buy marijuana by purchasing five or six baggies of it and then intend to smoke it or otherwise process it bag by bag, all entirely for themselves.  Lastly, sometimes the client does have a lot of money in small denominations, but the client’s job involves accepting such forms of money.

The most common defense to a charge of sales is that the police search was illegal, i.e. the police did not get a warrant when they should have and could have, the consent to the search was coerced, the police exceeded the scope of the consent or there was no valid factual circumstances for an exception to the warrant requirement to apply.  Such a defense depends on the facts and will vary with each case.

The other defense we see quite often is that the weight of the marijuana overstates the weight of the usable, consumable portion.  This is an issue when the marijuana is uncut, or has a great deal of stem particles.

The punishment for being convicted of possession of marijuana for sales begins with a low term of sixteen months in state prison (most likely to be served in county jail, but this does depend upon the overall facts and the criminal history of the client), leading up to three years.  Enhancements can apply to the sentence based on the weight of the marijuana seized and whether the sales were in furtherance of or for the benefit of a criminal street gang.
 
On a first-time offense, however, it is possible for a defendant to receive a probationary sentence, although there may be a short period of time in custody.  The plea bargain or sentence may also include a healthy amount of community service, usually in the form of Cal-Trans.

For more information about drug offenses in general, please click on the following articles:
  1. Medical Marijuana Cultivation Expert Disqualified at Trial
  2. A Medical Marijuana Certificate Is Not Always a Valid Defense to a Charge of Possession for Sales
  3. Honey Oil and Dabs Found Covered by Prop 215, the Compassionate Use Act (CUA) Regarding Medical Marijuana
Contact us.
Client Reviews
★★★★★
"Thank you so much for putting so much effort in this case. We really appreciate it and we are happy that all turned out well." S.A., Torrance
★★★★★
"Greg Hill did an outstanding job on every level. He was efficient, thorough, knowledgeable, courteous, responsive & brilliant. He welcomed my input and my concerns. . . from the first conversation to the last - I always felt 'it mattered' to him." S.C., Rolling Hills Estates
★★★★★
"Thanks again for your hard work. We want you to know that we are very appreciative of all that you have done [on our son's] behalf. With warmest regards." L.H., Torrance
★★★★★
"Dear Greg, Thank you again for all your help. Your professionalism and thoroughness is greatly admired. I will definitely recommend you to my friends if they ever need legal help." V.L., Carson
★★★★★
"Thanks for investing in my case. I talked to other attorneys out there and they had an arms-length of attitude, but not you. Your intensity and interest helped a lot." C.R., Pomona